Skip to main content

๐Ÿ“‹ QIS (Quality Implementation Support) KPI Reference Guide

Generated on: July 09, 2025 at 05:59 PM

๐ŸŽฏ Executive Summaryโ€‹

This document provides comprehensive details for 18 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Quality Inspection Specialist performance for System Engineer role.

๐Ÿ“ˆ Summary Statisticsโ€‹

  • Total KPIs: 18
  • Total Weightage: 100%
  • Automated KPIs: 10 (55.6%)
  • Manual KPIs: 8 (44.4%)

๐Ÿ“Š Frequency Distributionโ€‹

  • Monthly: 10 KPIs
  • Per Sprint: 4 KPIs
  • Post Production: 1 KPIs
  • Quarterly: 1 KPIs
  • Sit End: 2 KPIs

๐Ÿ’พ Data Sourcesโ€‹

  • JIRA: 18 KPIs

๐Ÿ“‹ Detailed KPI Specificationsโ€‹

โฑ๏ธ 1. Pulse Complianceโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID703
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: Ensure Pulse entries are updated regularly

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: % of hours utilized

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Measure how accurately employees log their work hours in Pulse relative to their assigned capacity, ensuring discipline in time reporting and data integrity for planning.
Formula: Compliance Rate (%) = Total Hours Reported in Pulse / Total Assigned Capacity Hours ร— 100

Data Sources: BI Dashboard
Calculation Steps:
Extract the compliance data from the BI dashboard daily for each resource, which already contains the computed compliance % to date for every resource.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)95pulseCompliance
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)90pulseCompliance
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)85pulseCompliance
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)80pulseCompliance
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)80pulseCompliance

๐Ÿ“… 2. Attendanceโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID704
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: Compliance to attendance policies

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: % of working days marked

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Ensure that every workday is covered by either a valid attendance record or an approved leave entry; missing both constitutes non-compliance.

Formula: NonCompliantDay = (No AttendanceRecord) AND (No LeaveRecord)

Data Sources: WebHR

Calculation Steps:
1. For each employee, check the date three days prior to today to allow for data processing.
2.
Query WebHR: is there an AttendanceRecord? is there a LeaveRecord?
3. If neither exists, mark the day as non-compliant (NonCompliantDay = true).
4. Repeat daily to maintain a running tally of non-compliant days.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)95Attendance
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)90Attendance
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)85Attendance
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)80Attendance
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)80Attendance

๐ŸŽฏ 3. Test Case Effectivenessโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID705
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyPer Sprint
Automation๐Ÿ‘ค Manual
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: the percentage of test cases that successfully identify defects.

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: % of # of Defects / # of Test Cases Executed

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)50testCaseEffectiveness
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)40testCaseEffectiveness
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)35testCaseEffectiveness
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)30testCaseEffectiveness
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)30testCaseEffectiveness

โšก 4. QA Test Execution Timeโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID706
Weightage5%
MeasureCount
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyPer Sprint
Automation๐Ÿ‘ค Manual
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: Measures the time taken to execute a set of test cases.

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of Test Cases Executed / Total Time Taken

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)25testExecutionTime
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)20testExecutionTime
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)15testExecutionTime
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)10testExecutionTime
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)10testExecutionTime

โšก 5. Implementation Test Execution Timeโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID707
Weightage5%
MeasureCount
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencySit End
Automation๐Ÿ‘ค Manual
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: Measures the time taken to execute a set of test cases.

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of Test Cases Executed / Total Time Taken

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)25testExecutionTime
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)20testExecutionTime
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)15testExecutionTime
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)10testExecutionTime
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)10testExecutionTime

๐Ÿ› 6. QA Invalid Bugs Countโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID708
Weightage5%
MeasureCount
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyPer Sprint
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score5

๐Ÿ“ Description: Number of invalid bugs reported

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of Rejected Bugs

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Count the number of bug reports submitted by QIS that were later rejected or marked as not a bug.

Formula: Invalid Bug Count = Number of issues where Reporter = QIS and Closing_Reason โˆˆ {โ€œRejectโ€, โ€œNot a Bugโ€}

Data Sources: Jira โ€œPOLโ€ project; Reporter = QIS; Closing_Reason (Reject, Not a Bug); Close Timestamp

Calculation Steps:
1. Query Jira โ€œPOLโ€ for all issues where Reporter = QIS within the reporting period.
2. From that set, filter issues whose Closing_Reason is โ€œRejectโ€ or โ€œNot a Bug.โ€
3. Count the total number of filtered issues.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5<= (less than or equal to)2invalidBugsCount
๐ŸŸข 4<= (less than or equal to)4invalidBugsCount
๐ŸŸก 3<= (less than or equal to)6invalidBugsCount
๐ŸŸ  2<= (less than or equal to)8invalidBugsCount
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)8invalidBugsCount

๐Ÿ› 7. Implementation Invalid Bugs Countโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID709
Weightage5%
MeasureCount
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencySit End
Automation๐Ÿ‘ค Manual
Default Score5

๐Ÿ“ Description: Number of invalid bugs reported

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of Rejected Bugs

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Count the number of bug reports submitted by QIS that were later rejected or marked as not a bug.

Formula: Invalid Bug Count = Number of issues where Reporter = QIS and Closing_Reason โˆˆ {โ€œRejectโ€, โ€œNot a Bugโ€}

Data Sources: Jira โ€œPOLโ€ project; Reporter = QIS; Closing_Reason (Reject, Not a Bug); Close Timestamp

Calculation Steps:
1. Query Jira โ€œPOLโ€ for all issues where Reporter = QIS within the reporting period.
2. From that set, filter issues whose Closing_Reason is โ€œRejectโ€ or โ€œNot a Bug.โ€
3. Count the total number of filtered issues.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5<= (less than or equal to)2invalidBugsCount
๐ŸŸข 4<= (less than or equal to)4invalidBugsCount
๐ŸŸก 3<= (less than or equal to)6invalidBugsCount
๐ŸŸ  2<= (less than or equal to)8invalidBugsCount
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)8invalidBugsCount

โฐ 8. QA SLAโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID710
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: To measure SLA of QA is met for production issues

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: SLA Achieved for tickets assigned

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Monitor how effectively the team resolves production issues within the agreed SLA window.
Data Sources: Jira โ€œProduction Issueโ€ tickets; Assignment Timestamp; Completion Timestamp; SLA Target (hours).
Calculation Steps:
1.
Select Tickets: Pull all โ€œProduction Issueโ€ tickets assigned during the reporting month.
2.
Determine SLA Status: classify as non-breached (resolution duration โ‰ค SLA Target) or breached (duration > SLA Target).
3.
Compute Rate: SLA Achievement Rate (%) = (Number of Non-breached Tickets / Total Tickets Assigned) ร— 100
4.
Evaluate Performance: review the percentage of non-breached tickets to assess SLA compliance.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)95qaTAT
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)90qaTAT
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)85qaTAT
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)80qaTAT
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)80qaTAT

๐Ÿ”ง 9. Production Patch Revert / Resubmissionโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID711
Weightage5%
MeasureCount
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyQuarterly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score5

๐Ÿ“ Description: To measure number of patches that are either reverted or a subsequent patch has to be resubmitted

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of Impacted Patches / Total number of Patches sent

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Measure the proportion of production patches that are reverted or require a subsequent resubmission.

Formula: Patch Revert Rate (%) = (Number of Impacted Patches / Total Patches Sent) ร— 100

Data Sources: Jira; Level 0 Sub-status; Status change history

Definition of Terms: Total Patches Sent = issues with Level 0 Sub-status = โ€œPatch Dispatched to clientโ€ or โ€œAwaiting Client Responseโ€; Impacted Patches = those sent patches whose status changed from โ€œLevel 0 โ€“ Client Endโ€ back to โ€œLevel 2 โ€“ Support Engineerโ€ while still in a sent sub-status.

Calculation Steps: 1. Query Jira for โ€œsentโ€ patches;
2. Count these as Total Patches Sent;
3. Identify reverts via status history and count as Impacted Patches;
4. Compute rate using the formula;

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5<= (less than or equal to)2productionPatchRevert
๐ŸŸข 4<= (less than or equal to)4productionPatchRevert
๐ŸŸก 3<= (less than or equal to)6productionPatchRevert
๐ŸŸ  2<= (less than or equal to)8productionPatchRevert
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)8productionPatchRevert

๐Ÿ“Š 10. Test Coverageโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID712
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyPer Sprint
Automation๐Ÿ‘ค Manual
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: Indicates the percentage of the software that has been tested.

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: % of features assigned in a sprint

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)95testCoverage
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)90testCoverage
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)85testCoverage
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)80testCoverage
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)80testCoverage

๐Ÿšจ 11. Escape Defect Count SITโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID713
Weightage10%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score5

๐Ÿ“ Description: Counts the number of defects that were not identified during testing but were discovered after the software was released.

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of Defects per feature identified during SIT

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Track the number of defects identified during System Integration Testing (SIT) by each assignee.
Formula:

Formula: SIT Defect Count = Number of issues where Phase = SIT and Assigned To = target user
Formula: SIT Defect Count = Number of issues where Phase = SIT and Assigned To = target user
Data Sources: Jira โ€œPOLโ€ project; Phase = โ€œSITโ€; Assigned To; Closed Timestamp.
Calculation Steps:
1. Query Jira โ€œPOLโ€ for all issues where Phase = โ€œSITโ€ and Assigned To = the target assignee, and Closed Timestamp falls within the reporting period.
2. Count the total number of issues returned.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5<= (less than or equal to)2escapeDefectCountSIT
๐ŸŸข 4<= (less than or equal to)4escapeDefectCountSIT
๐ŸŸก 3<= (less than or equal to)6escapeDefectCountSIT
๐ŸŸ  2<= (less than or equal to)8escapeDefectCountSIT
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)8escapeDefectCountSIT

๐Ÿšจ 12. Escape Defect Count UATโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID714
Weightage10%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score5

๐Ÿ“ Description: Counts the number of defects that were not identified during testing but were discovered after the software was released.

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of Defects per feature identified during UAT

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Track the number of defects reported during User Acceptance Testing (UAT) by each reporter.

Formula: UAT Defect Count = Number of issues where Phase = UAT and Reporter = target user

Data Sources: Jira โ€œPOLโ€ project; Phase = โ€œUATโ€; Reporter; Creation Timestamp

Calculation Steps:
1. Query Jira โ€œPOLโ€ for all issues where Phase = โ€œUATโ€ and Reporter = the target user within the reporting period.
2. Count the total number of issues returned.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5<= (less than or equal to)2escapeDefectCountUAT
๐ŸŸข 4<= (less than or equal to)4escapeDefectCountUAT
๐ŸŸก 3<= (less than or equal to)6escapeDefectCountUAT
๐ŸŸ  2<= (less than or equal to)8escapeDefectCountUAT
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)8escapeDefectCountUAT

๐Ÿค– 13. QA Test Case Automationโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID715
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automation๐Ÿ‘ค Manual
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: To measure number of cases automated during testing

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: % of Unit Cases Automated

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)95testCaseAutomation
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)90testCaseAutomation
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)85testCaseAutomation
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)80testCaseAutomation
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)80testCaseAutomation

๐Ÿค– 14. Implementation Test Case Automationโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID716
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automation๐Ÿ‘ค Manual
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: To measure number of cases automated during testing

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: % of Unit Cases Automated

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)95testCaseAutomation
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)90testCaseAutomation
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)85testCaseAutomation
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)80testCaseAutomation
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)80testCaseAutomation

๐Ÿญ 15. Post Production Defectsโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID717
Weightage5%
MeasureCount
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyPost Production
Automation๐Ÿ‘ค Manual
Default Score5

๐Ÿ“ Description: Number of Post Production Defects after Cutover

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of bugs logged post production

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5<= (less than or equal to)2postProductionDefects
๐ŸŸข 4<= (less than or equal to)4postProductionDefects
๐ŸŸก 3<= (less than or equal to)6postProductionDefects
๐ŸŸ  2<= (less than or equal to)8postProductionDefects
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)8postProductionDefects

โšก 16. L2 SLA - S3 & S4โ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID718
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: To measure SLA of Investigation once the issue is reported

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: SLA Achieved for tickets assigned

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Measure the percentage of production tickets assigned to you that meet the defined SLA for Severity 3 and Severity 4 incidents.

Severity Levels: S3 (Level 3 โ€“ Normal), S4 (Level 4 โ€“ General)

Formula: SLA Achievement Rate (%) = (Tickets Resolved Within SLA / Total Tickets Assigned) ร— 100

Data Sources: Ticketing System; Severity (S3, S4);; Resolution Timestamp; SLA Target (by severity level)

Calculation Steps: 1.
Filter Tickets: select Level 3 & 4 tickets assigned in the period.
2.
Assess SLA Compliance: compare each ticketโ€™s resolution time vs. SLA target and count those resolved within SLA.
3.
Compute Rate: apply the formula.
4.
Apply Weighting: multiply the result by the KPIโ€™s weight.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)95l2TAT
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)90l2TAT
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)85l2TAT
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)80l2TAT
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)80l2TAT

๐Ÿ”„ 17. L2 Reassignmentโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID719
Weightage5%
MeasureCount
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: Number of reassigned tickets once the issue is identified as a bug and assigned to the QIS again

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: # of Reassigned Tickets / # of Tickets identified as bugs

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

KPI: Ticket Reassignment Count
Purpose: Measure how often tickets with Assignment Level 2 are reassigned back to a Level-2 role theyโ€™ve already been through (even after moving to other roles) before completion.
Formula: Ticket Reassignment Count = Total number of reassignment events where Assignment Level = 2 and Role after = any Level-2 role already in this ticketโ€™s history
Data Sources: Ticketing System (e.g., Jira โ€œPOLโ€ project); Assignment Level; Status History; Assignment History
Calculation Steps: 1. Query tickets where Assignment Level = 2 that reached โ€œCompletedโ€ status within the reporting period.
2. For each ticket, retrieve its full assignment-change history in chronological order.
3. Track the sequence of Level-2 roles the ticket has been assigned to (Support, Network, Database).
4. Whenever itโ€™s assigned to a Level-2 role that already appears earlier in that sequence, count one reassignment event (e.g., Support โ†’ Network โ†’ Database โ†’ Network (reassignment #1) โ†’ Support (reassignment #2)).
5. Sum all such events across completed Level-2 tickets to get the Ticket Reassignment Count for the period.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5<= (less than or equal to)2l2Reassignment
๐ŸŸข 4<= (less than or equal to)4l2Reassignment
๐ŸŸก 3<= (less than or equal to)6l2Reassignment
๐ŸŸ  2<= (less than or equal to)8l2Reassignment
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)8l2Reassignment

๐Ÿšจ 18. S1 & S2 SLAโ€‹

AttributeValue
KPI ID720
Weightage5%
MeasurePercentage
Data SourceJIRA
FrequencyMonthly
Automationโœ… Automated
Default Score0

๐Ÿ“ Description: To measure SLA of severity incidents

๐Ÿงฎ Formula: SLA Achieved for severity incidents

๐Ÿ“ Calculation Details:

Purpose: Measure the percentage of production tickets assigned to QIS that meet the defined SLA for Severity 1 and Severity 2 incidents.

Severity Levels: S1 (Level 1 โ€“ Severe), S2 (Level 2 โ€“ Critical)

Formula: SLA Achievement Rate (%) = (Tickets Resolved Within SLA / Total Tickets Assigned) ร— 100

Data Sources: Ticketing System; Severity (S1, S2); Resolution Timestamp; SLA Target (by severity level)

Calculation Steps: 1.
Filter Tickets: Severity wise select Level 1 & 2 tickets assigned to a resourcein the period.
2.
Assess SLA Compliance: compare each ticketโ€™s resolution time vs. SLA target and count those resolved within SLA.
3.
Compute Rate: apply the formula.
4.
Apply Weighting: multiply the result by the KPIโ€™s weight.

๐Ÿ‘ฅ Applicability:

  • Designation: System Engineer

๐ŸŽฏ Scoring Rules:

ScoreConditionThresholdField
๐ŸŸข 5>= (greater than or equal to)95s1S2TAT
๐ŸŸข 4>= (greater than or equal to)90s1S2TAT
๐ŸŸก 3>= (greater than or equal to)85s1S2TAT
๐ŸŸ  2>= (greater than or equal to)80s1S2TAT
๐Ÿ”ด 1> (greater than)80s1S2TAT

This document was automatically generated from KPI specifications on July 09, 2025